Jenningsbet CEO Warns Rising Racing Media Costs Are Driving Betting Shop Closures
Greg Knight says escalating costs for live horse racing broadcasts and data have become a major financial burden for UK retail bookmakers as hundreds of high street shops face closure.

Rising costs associated with broadcasting live horse racing and supplying racing data to betting shops are placing increasing financial pressure on the UK's retail bookmaking sector, according to Jenningsbet CEO and owner Greg Knight.
Knight has argued that the impact of media rights costs has been overlooked in much of the recent discussion surrounding the closure of hundreds of high street betting shops.
While acknowledging that higher employment costs and the long-term migration of customers towards online betting have contributed to pressures facing retail operators, Knight believes the rising price of live racing content represents a particularly significant challenge.
"The cost of broadcasting live racing and data into betting shops has increased so dramatically over the past 3 years that it dwarfs every tax rise put together," Knight said in a post on LinkedIn.
"This is the real story behind these closures, and it doesn't seem to be getting told."
Media Rights Costs Put Pressure On Retail Operators
Live horse racing has traditionally been an important part of the betting shop proposition, with operators paying for pictures and accompanying data supplied through racing media rights agreements.
Knight said retail bookmakers have been required to renegotiate commercial agreements with Sports Information Services (SIS) and The Racing Partnership (TRP) over the past two years.
According to the Jenningsbet CEO, the importance of live racing content leaves operators facing a difficult commercial decision when negotiating those agreements.
"We can't afford to broadcast live content, and we can't afford not to," Knight said.
He pointed to the temporary absence of some racing pictures from Betfred and William Hill shops during previous negotiations as evidence of the tensions surrounding media rights costs.
"Betfred and William Hill initially refused to sign renewed contracts with one of the media rights companies last year, with shops going dark for a period as a result. Good on them, it was a brave stance to take," Knight said.
"Eventually, they had no option but to sign. At what cost is not public knowledge, but it is no coincidence that between them they have announced over 350 closures this summer."
Knight did not provide details of the commercial agreements involved, and the terms agreed between individual bookmakers and racing media rights providers are not publicly available.
Knight Warns Of 'Vicious Loop' For Betting Shops
Knight also argued that the structure of media rights agreements could place greater pressure on remaining bookmakers as the size of the retail estate declines.
He described a "vicious loop" in which fewer betting shops could result in higher media costs per remaining location, potentially increasing the financial pressure on those shops and contributing to further closures.
"Shop numbers fall, so media rights costs per shop increase to compensate. More shops close as a result. Costs for the survivors go up again," Knight said.
The comments come at a challenging time for Britain's retail betting industry, with operators balancing increased employment and operating costs against longer-term changes in customer behaviour and the continued growth of online gambling.
Knight acknowledged both factors but rejected the suggestion that they fully explain the recent wave of shop closures.
Horse Racing Economics Under Scrutiny
The Jenningsbet CEO also questioned the economics of offering horse racing within betting shops when the costs of acquiring the necessary pictures and data are taken into account.
"The industry has been saying for years that horse racing is becoming a loss leader in most shops. We've been accused of bluffing," Knight said.
"350 closures in 3 months is some bluff!"
Knight's comments represent the perspective of a retail bookmaker operating within the sector, with media rights costs forming one element of the wider financial pressures facing high street operators.
The debate also highlights the close commercial relationship between British racing and bookmakers. Live pictures and data remain an important part of the retail betting experience, while payments associated with racing content provide revenue to the sport.
With the number of betting shops continuing to decline, the affordability of that relationship is likely to remain an important issue for both bookmakers and British racing as they consider the future of the high street betting model.







