DraftKings Reverses Decision on Gaming Tax Surcharge
The company announced its change of heart in a statement released on Tuesday evening, attributing the reversal to "customer feedback" as the main factor behind the decision.

DraftKings will no longer proceed with its proposed gaming tax surcharge, just two weeks after announcing plans to implement the charge in states with high tax rates.
The company announced its change of heart in a statement released on Tuesday evening, attributing the reversal to "customer feedback" as the main factor behind the decision.
Originally, DraftKings had planned to introduce a surcharge to offset the costs associated with gaming taxes in certain states. The surcharge was set to take effect at the beginning of 2025. However, the company likely reconsidered its approach after its primary competitor, FanDuel, declared during an earnings call that it would not be implementing a similar charge.
In its official statement, DraftKings explained:
“We always listen to our customers, and after hearing their feedback, we have decided not to move forward with the gaming tax surcharge. We are always committed to delivering the best value in the industry to our loyal customers.”
This decision could help DraftKings avoid potential backlash from customers who might have considered switching to rival sportsbooks that do not impose additional fees.
In July 2024, DraftKings was fined $100,000 by the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement for inaccurate financial reporting. The issue required state regulators to correct several months' worth of sports betting data. The errors included overstating the amount of money wagered on parlays and understating other types of wagers, which led to incorrect tax filings by Resorts Digital, DraftKings' partner in New Jersey.
Despite these setbacks, DraftKings reported a 53% year-on-year revenue increase for Q1 2024, reaching $1.18 billion. However, the company also posted an operating loss of $138.8 million for the quarter, an improvement from the $389.8 million loss in the same period last year, but still indicative of ongoing financial challenges.








